close
close

topicnews · July 17, 2025

The crime of reading a new Russian law

The crime of reading a new Russian law

The Russian government has developed a new crime for the citizens: “Search intentionally and access extremist materials.” Once again, legislators use a familiar tactic that is ground through other repressive laws:

  • First, take a law that has already passed his first reading (in this case a “disruptive administrative penalty for certain violations in the area of transport and logistics”)).
  • Then add changes before the second reading that radically change the original intention of the invoice.

2

Why do you use this approach? Can't you pass the bill you want at all?

This approach enables legislators to quickly pursue the passage of a law and to reduce the time for the public debate drastically. It is also prevented from having to explain the initiative at all – after all, only an explanatory note is published if a legislation is introduced for the first time in the state Duma.

The legislator approved the new provision on “intentionally according to extremist materials and accessible”. In the second reading of the invoice on July 17th.

3

What counts as “extremist materials”?

The answer is not that easy. The new administrative code article shows two ways to determine what is qualified.

  • The first is self -explanatory: a table of contents is considered “extremist” if it is contained in the public federal list of extremist materials.
  • The second opens the door to wide and arbitrary enforcement. In this case, the authors of the change application refer to the definition of the federal law “to combat extremist activities”. This includes documents or information that “calls for extremist activities or justify or legitimize the need for such an activity”.

According to Russian law, the definition of extremist activities is extremely broad. It covers everything, from “terrorist activities” to the use of symbols or branding, which are referred to with organizations that are called “extremists” in Russia, such as Alexey Navalny's anti-corruption foundation and the non-existent “international LGBT movement”, which were called “extremists”.

4

Is Meduza's reporting viewed as a “extremist” content?

In Russia, Meduza is referred to as a “foreign agent” and “undesirable organization”. This is uncomfortable and carries its own risks (which is why we no longer accept donations from Russia and have no employees there). But even according to Russian law, it is currently not a crime, just after and read to search for and read our articles.

5

What about other independent media? Was one of them called “extremist”?

Strangely, not still not watched by Leconka, a newspaper that has now been dissolved, which the Russian authorities banned from the Russian authorities at the beginning of Vladimir Putin's presidency. But of course the government does not prevent the government from describing media as “extremist”, which would effectively make it illegal to read it. This is what is known as a criminalization of reading – and this new calculation is a step in this direction.

6

Where exactly is it illegal to look for “extremist” content? Only online?

Yes, yes – although it is unclear what could come next. The law expressly states that a violation only applies to the search for “extremist” content, especially on the Internet.

7

Are people really just punished for the search?

It's hard to say, but it doesn't seem that way. In order to remain liable, one person probably has to do two things: looking for the forbidden content And Use it (for example by clicking on a link).

In other articles of the administrative code, one of several actions is sufficient to represent a violation, the word “or” is used. For example:

  • Article 5.12: Production, distribution or publication Campaign materials against election and referendum laws
  • Article 7.17: Destroy or damage the property of another
  • Article 8.5: Hide or fake Environmental information

But the new article 13.53 begins with the expression: “Intentionally looking for extremist materials and access them. “The sentence in the original version of the Bill was even easier:”Search and access Extremist materials. “

8

So does this mean that Pro-Kremlin activists who are looking for “extremist” content to report that others could also violate the law?

Technically speaking yes. The new article does not indicate any exceptions based on a person's motif, for “extremist” materials.

It is unclear whether activists who report other crimes in connection with banned materials are burdened themselves – but they are already nervous. For example, Yekaterina Mizulina, head of the Safe -Internet -League of the Zensur -Lobby thesis, criticized the change and said that her organization had to stop monitoring the “extremist communities” and the transfer of information about her to the Interior Ministry of Russia.

9

What will the punishment be?

Each criminal offense will bear an administrative fine of 3,000 to 5,000 rubles (33 to 55 US dollars).

For repeat offices, there is currently no strong increase in fine or the criminal complaint. But it is worth changing in the future.

10

Who is responsible for catching offenders?

Police officers and FSB agents will be responsible for violations of offenses.

However, the police can only issue a report if they find clear signs of a crime -for example, if an official personally discovers “extremist” search queries or visits to “extremist” pages in their telephone or computer browser history. FSB agents will not have this restriction. You have the authority to collect such information remote.

In any case, however, it is the dishes that check these cases and decide on punishments.

11

Wait – what does “from a distance” mean?

The FSB can use data from information systems that you can access to search for perpetrators.

For example, thanks to the close cooperation with the Russian social media service VK (and several other so-called “information sales organizers”), security officers can see who searched for banned content on social media and then clicked down on left or downloaded relatives.

12

When I'm in Russia, is there a way to protect myself from this all -time eye?

At the moment we can only give general advice.

  • Always use a VPN to make it difficult for the authorities to pursue the websites you have visited.
  • Try to use search engines that do not work with the Russian authorities, or – even better – that do not collect any user data at all (like Duckduckgo).
  • Do not save your browser history or delete it regularly.
  • Keep your phones and computers protected against unauthorized access.

It is also worth considering what happened in Belarus to get signs of what comes to Russia.

13

What does Belarus have to do with it?

In Belarus, the “criminalization of reading” is widespread and has long been applied to independent media. Aliaksan Pushkina, Communication Director of the Independent Outlet Zerkalo, explained how it works as follows:

In Belarus they can simply be arrested to read the “wrong” messages. This is not an exaggeration. In the past three or four years, the persecution of consumption for consumption of information has become a standard, in the middle of the procedure of the authorities and the regime's paranoia.

All it needs is a telegram channel that the authorities have added to the list of “extremist materials”. Or save a screenshot of a contribution. Or forward messages to a friend. That is enough to have arrested them. Or sometimes even imprisoned.

At first, the repression only aimed at authors and editorial teams. Then they stretched to readers who shared content. Now it can be anyone who has such content on their phone – even without evidence that they shared them. This has become a separate form of control: the reader is already a suspect.

It is not just the media that are referred to as an “extremist” – it can be the personal side of a person (for example the legendary Belarusian basketball player Katianna Snytsina), a book or a Tikok account. Practically everything. Officially, the list of extremist materials now contains more than 7,000 articles. Many are completely common. Nobody knows when the next account will be added. Users are not notified.

Dearts treat these cases in minutes. A screenshot is proof. A subscription is a reason for suspicion. There is no presumption of innocence. Having a VPN means: “You hide something.” There have already been convicts of seeing a video, a comment in a chat or for a stored story.

How does this control work? About raids, random checks and telephone search on the street. Intherds are asked to unlock their devices – and their subscriptions, likes and browser history are inspected. Informers also play a role: in an atmosphere of fear, people turn each other on each other. Sometimes in the hope of saving yourself.

We see a new culture of digital self -protection. People read content about the goal browser, use VPNs and save information on separate devices. They encrypt their phones. Delete your chats. Open messages in incognito mode. This is not just information hygiene – it is a survival strategy.

This is not an abstract fear. If you are caught with the content of an “extremist group” (there are also “extremist materials” and the difference in the severity of potential punishment), the best-case scenario is a fine of several hundred euros. They can be recorded in a detention center for up to 24 hours. Or because of criminal charges – with prison sentence of up to seven years behind bars. You can reach up to eight years for financing (reading: donations). In Belarus today, people are prosecuted because of screenshots, likes or because of the “wrong” chat group. These cases count in the thousands.

Under these circumstances, it is already an act of resistance to read independent sources, read the messages or stay up to date. Not out of heroism – but only one person who wants to understand the world in whom they live.