Apple sued Youtuber, who had planted “Spion” for iOS 26 -leaks in the house of the Apple employee: Here what happened

Tl; Dr

Who is Jon ProSser?

Jon Prosser is a prominent Tech Leaker who carries out the Tech -Youtube channel of the front page, which is known for revealing unpublished Apple products and functions. At the beginning of 2025 he received considerable attention to his detailed leaks from what was called iOS 19 at the time (now iOS 26).

ProSsers iOS 26 LECKS included:

Camera -App new design (January 2025): ProSser showed a simplified camera -app with optimized buttons for switching between photo and video modes. Message App Overhaul (March 2025): He revealed the message app with round navigation buttons above and rounded corners around the keyboard. Liquid glass Interface (April 2025): His most comprehensive leak showed the glass-like interface elements, pill-shaped tab beams and round design elements, which ultimately debut in iOS 26.While some details differed from Apple's final publication, the LECKS directions were precisely and give competitors the knowledge of Apple's software designs.

Why did Apple sued Jon ProSser?

Apple's lawsuit, submitted on July 17, 2025 in the northern district of California, applies to a coordinated system in which several defendants are involved. The company began to investigate an anonymous tip on April 4, 2025, in which the Apple employee Ethan Lipnik was identified as a potential source.

1. The alleged violation

According to Apple's complaint, Ramacciotti used the location tracking to monitor when Lipnik was removed from his apartment in Santa Clara, received his pass code and was accessible to his development iPhone. The device contained unpublished iOS 19 software and “considerable amounts of additional information on the secret of Apple, which have not yet been publicly announced”.

2. The FaceTime recording

During the non -authorized access, Ramacciotti ProSser allegedly made a FaceTime call and demonstrated the unpublished operating system. According to reports, ProSser has recorded the screen using Capture tools and received confidential software designs and functions.

3 .. Monetarization and distribution

Apple claims that ProSser shared the records with others and used them to create content for its YouTube channel, which generates advertising revenue from Apple's business secrets. The company says that at least one person has recognized Lipnik's apartment in the background of ProSser's videos.

What Apple is looking for

Apple calls for legal proceedings and is looking for several forms of relief:

The lawsuit contains claims within the framework of the Law on Defend trade secret and the law on computer fraud and abuse.

Why is it important

The case underlines the continued struggle between technology companies that protect business secrets and the leak culture that surrounds unpublished products. Apple's aggressive legal steps send a clear message about the length that it will take to protect confidential information.Precedent case for technical leaks: This lawsuit could determine new standards for the pursuit of tech leaks and the leak ecosystem, which surrounds large product launches, could possibly cool down. Company obligation of the employees: The termination of Lipnik shows the professional consequences for Apple employees who do not protect development devices, even if they are not directly involved in LECKS. Competition damage: Apple argues that the leaks pushed the knowledge of his software designs to the competitors and possibly undermine development work for years of secret development work.

FAQ

Question: Did Jon ProSser actually break into the iPhone himself?

No.

Question: How was ProSser's reaction to the lawsuit?

ProSser denies Apple's claims and explained to X: “I didn't” plant “to access someone. I had no passwords. I was not aware of how the information was received. I look forward to talking to Apple about it.”

Question: What happened to the Apple employee, whose phone was accessed?

Ethan Lipnik ended by Apple because he did not follow any company guidelines to protect the development hardware and the unpublished software.

Question: Is this the first time that Apple has sued you?

While Apple often takes legal action against suppliers and manufacturers, the information leaves, it is less common to sue individual content and leaks, but not unprecedented.

Question: Could there be more leaks from the same source?

Yes. Apple warns that the iPhone contains additional unpublished functions that have not yet been publicly disclosed, which represents persistent competitive risks if the accused retain access to this information.