Stephen King torn for eyebrows, the Epstein takes

Stephen King surprisingly seemed to be on the side with Donald Trump's government on Jeffrey Epstein's “customer list” on the page of many of his fans.

King posted on X, a platform that he once swore to take a takeover in protest against Elon Musk: “The list of Epstein customers is real.

“Cmon dud. Obviously, Epstein had customers who could be put together in a list,” wrote one. “I hadn't expected this to be taken over by them,” wrote another.

Others went straight to the carotill and suggested that the author had involved himself. “The only time that they take Trump's side is the defense of rape of children?” One user wrote one, as one other added: “Sounds like someone had something to hide.”

The Daily Beast turned to King for a comment.

The case against Epstein has built up the usual subdivisions in the political landscape. Trump's Maga supporters who have not criticized Little for Trump's government have more than ever questioned and questioned

Maga Devoteee Megyn Kelly went so far that Trump “blessed” an cover -up of Epstein's crimes. And the conservative conspiracy theorist Alex Jones did not hide his disappointment with the president when it turned out that the case was dropped.

And while some voices celebrated the inner Maga dispute on the left, very few denied that the DOJ results are suspicious -with the exception of the king.

The famous writer is known for publishing Trump insults for his almost seven million online supporters. He is called Trump everything, from “a thin-skinned racist with the temperament of a 3-year-old” in 2016 to “miserable self-sufficient childish f-er” in 2020 and beyond.

King also recirculates memes that Trump calls “pedo” and has publicly referred to him as a liar over a dozen times. Only a day before, he explained Trump and his secretary of the home protection, Kristi Noem Racist again and wrote to X Monday: “The Trump/Noem Credo:” If you are white, you are good. If you are brown, go out of the city. “So his supporters were understandably surprised to find the same side as Trump if there is an Epstein situation.

At the time of publication, the author offered no explanation for his agreement that it does not exist, but some fans tried to explain the statement in his name.